In primitive societies punishment was mainly retributive. The retributive theory of just deserts and victim participation in plea bargaining david a. This course on the fairness of justice will take you deeper into the world of law. Kant holds that punishment ought to be inflicted on the criminal because he has committed a crime, not as a means to his own good or hat of others. Theology punishment or reward distributed in a future life based on performance in this. Nov 04, 2015 theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies. Wilson lawpsychology graduate training program, university of nebraska follow this and additional works at. Jan 15, 2015 in the retributivist theory of punishment, the punishment is seen as a form of payback for the crimes one has committed. Thus, utilitarians take special favor in deterrence, as not only does it lower the overall crime rate, but it often does so by imposing minimal punishment as punishment is an evil in itself. May 05, 2012 theories of punishment utilitarian vs. The incremental retributive impact of a death sentence.
The shape of any contemporary retributivist theory will be dictated by the need to preserve what seems most attractive in the retributive tradition, while at the same time avoiding or answering the main objections that have been raised to retributive action. Starkweather introduction one evening, karen found herself alone in the restroom of a public health building. And some see private law as essentially or predominantly an exercise in. In addition, the punishment for drug smuggling is a public beheading. But the problem with the retributive theory is that it fails to suggest an acceptable criterion whereby to discriminate between just and unjust punishment. Attempts to close the gap have taken several different forms, and only one is discussed in this paper. Mostly retributive justice seeks to punish a person for a crime in a way that is compensatory for the crime. Kant offers us the principle of equality between the crime and the penalty. According to this theory the aim of punishment is to prevent or deter others from committing similar offences. Rethinking theoretical foundations of retributive theory of. This article is brought to you for free and open access by the law, college of at.
Punishment for crimes are decided according to the impact they will have in our society. Moreover, the retributive theory of justice is intuitive and resonates with many moral attitudes widespread in our societies, such as the respect for agency and free will. On the utilitarian and retributive justifications of punishment. Occupied with thoughts of the days business, she could never have imagined the horrible event that was about to take place. Retributive and corrective justice, criminal and private law1. Any defense of the retributive theory seems to be an exercise in conservative penology bidden adieu by the progressive thinkers of criminology. Retributive justice stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. In general, the severity of the punishment is proportionate to the seriousness of the crime. The following theories of punishment explain how and why justice is doled out to those that deserve it. Much debate surrounds how to punish criminal offenders.
The objective of this paper is to compare the retributive concept of punishment with the islamic theory of qisas and to unravel how islam attempts to establish justice through punishment while. Modern theory of punishment modern theory of punishment is a combination of all the theories discussed above. The retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished. Theories of punishment legal definition of theories of. In other words, the monetary loss of the sufferer is compensated and the criminal has to compensate for the loss. Retributive theory of punishment is considered as a relic of the bygone era. Moores moral facts and the gap in the retributive theory. Retribution, crime reduction and the justification of punishment david wood. Retributive justice is a theory of punishment that when an offender breaks the law, justice requires that he or she suffer in return. A criminal is punished to be made an example of to prevent others from committing the same crime. In iran the punishment for adultery among other things is to be buried waist deep and stoned.
He is the former nonexecutive chairman of the nasdaq stock market, and. Proponents believe that people made the decision to commit the crime and the punishment is focused completely on the offense. I shall, for clarity, distinguish between pure and impure versions of retributi vism. The strengths and limits of the theory of retributive. Still, it leaves one with certain misgivings regarding the internal consistency of his position. Posted by andrew on may 5, 2012 in criminal law, key concepts 0 comments. The appeal of retributive justice as a theory of punishment rests in part on direct intuitive support, in part on the claim that it is better than alternative accounts of punishment, and in part on arguments tying it to deeper moral principles. Punishmentretribution, rehabilitation, and deterrence. Rethinking theoretical foundations of retributive theory.
Determinism and interderminism retributivist theory vs. Teeth for teeth, eye for eye are the basic principle of this theory. My paper in particular is an effort at restating, clarifying and. The purely retributive moral justification of punishment has a gap at its centre. Retributive and corrective justice say through insurance. Sir salmond has stated that the retributive purpose of punishment consists of avenging the wrong done by the criminal to the society. We discuss possible evolutionary origins of retributive justice, move on to more reflective philosophies of punishment prevalent in societal. Punishment is an end in itself, not a means to any end beyond itself. Perhaps the problem lies not in kants inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the metaphysic of morals, but rather.
Kants theory of punishment is commonly regarded as purely retributive in nature, and indeed much of his discourse seems to support that interpretation. Though extreme, the result is a country with a very low reported rate of theft and drug smuggling. Prevention of future crimes deterrence or rehabilitation of the offender are other purposes of punishment. Retributionists do not claim that the goals of rehabilitation and deterrence are excluded from or even contrary to a retributive theory but that they are merely secondary. Retributive definition of retributive by the free dictionary. Retributive theory is based on rights, desert and justice. Crime reduction and the justification of punishment, oxford journal of legal studies, volume 22, issue 2, summer. Punishment administered in return for a wrong committed. Kant says, punishment can never be administered merely as means for promoting another good either with regard to the criminal himself or to society. This sounds simple in the case of murdera life for a life. This theory of punishment refers to two different types of deterrence. First, the theory commits us to accepting that in punishing one person in order to deter others we are unacceptably using him. We turn to look at some of these main objections now. Retributive theory this theory is based on the idea of vindictive justice, or a tooth for a tooth and an eye for an eye.
According to this theory, evil should be returned for evil without any regard to consequence. It fails to explain why the offender should not be protected from punishment by the intuitively powerful moral idea that afflicting another person other than to avoid a greater harm is always wrong. Theories of punishment legal definition of theories of punishment. The utilitarian theory of punishment seeks to punish offenders to discourage, or deter, future wrongdoing. The principle is that if a man has caused the loss of a mans eye, his eye one shall cause to be lost. The retributive theory of just deserts pdf paperity. Social norms, necessity, and social desirability are some of the factors that lawmakers balance when developing punishment statutes. Retributive theory of punishment vengeance theory it is a concept of primitive society which consists of injury inflicted by way of retaliation by victim of crime on actor of crime, which requires the existence of victim as well as a wrong doer. Humanitarian theory the problem bernard madoff is an american former businessman, stockbroker, investment advisor financier and white collar criminal.
Short essay on the preventive theory of punishment. The incremental retributive impact of a death sentence over life without parole michael l. The offender should receive as much pain and sufferings as inflicted by him on his victim. Retributive theory on punishment vs humanitarian theory on. What is the difference between retributive theory and expiation theory. Retributive and deterrent theories of punishment youtube. Retributive theory law and legal definition uslegal, inc. Retributive justice is a theory that the goal of punishment for criminal violations is for the offender to pay his or her debt to society. Because the most commonly discussed version of retributivism is developed from kants moral and legal theory, i will refer to it as kantian retributivism. The example is extreme, but one can imagine how such a punishment would deter adultery. By providing punishment the feelings of victims were satisfied. The focus is on matching the punishment to the crime and. Retribution, crime reduction and the justification of.
Retribution appears alongside restorative principles in law codes from the. Radelet abstract in this paper, i take a closer look at retribution, which is the primary justification for the death penalty today in the united states and the main component of the additional punishment imposed by the death penalty over and above life. This interpretation of kants theory of punishment has been developed by herbert morris, persons and punishment, 52 m onist 475 1968, and murphy, supra note 1. The incremental retributive impact of a death sentence over. Ii, november i978 retribution and the theory of punishments he idea that retribution, along with prevention of crime t and reformation of convicted criminals, plays a role in the nature and practice of punishment is a common theme in accounts of punishment at least since t. It also requires that the response to a crime is proportional to the offence. The retributive theory of punishment holds that punishment is justified by the moral requirement that the guilty make amends for the harm they have caused to society. Retributive theories generally maintain, as did the italian criminologist cesare beccaria 173894, that the severity of a punishment should be proportionate to the gravity of. The paper here is a chapter in a volume published in 2011 from oxford up and the volume includes the essays of other scholars on the theories and policies associated with retributive justice. The strengths and limits of the theory of retributive punishment.
The paper returns to this argument in part 4, as the starting point for its. The retributive theory suggests that the offender should pay for his or her crime. Perhaps the problem lies not in kants inconsistency nor in the senility sometimes claimed to be apparent in the metaphysic of morals, but. Unlike the theory of deterrence and the preventive theory, the retributive theory is a retrospective theory, it looks back. Theories of punishment can be divided into two general philosophies. The utilitarian theory of justice follows a consequentialist logic. Under the utilitarian philosophy, laws should be used. Implications of psychoanalytic theory for the retributive theory of punishment kent a. Retributive and corrective justice 1 introduction some see criminal law as essentially or predominantly an exercise in retributive justice. According to this theory, punishment is an act of injustice. That is, morriss reliance on the idea that punishment is a way of restoring the equilibrium between benefits and burdens upset by criminal wrongdoing leads him, and those who have followed, to a theory that essentially makes retributive justice a. The punishment of an innocent, that is, an undeserving, man is wicked only if we grant the traditional view that righteous punishment means deserved punishment. It aims at restoring the social balance disturbed by the offender.
However, what are the precise formative ideas of retributive theory. The simplest version of the deterrence theory of punishment, that we may punish o. In the retributivist theory of punishment, the punishment is seen as a form of payback for the crimes one has committed. On the utilitarian and retributive justifications of. In textbooks on punishment one usually finds four major theories or justifications of punishment.
971 1230 1009 1293 789 358 1055 1308 1362 121 884 217 719 1382 116 130 891 1113 1595 203 956 364 187 961 1259 106 10 1407 404 36 1162 579 656 46 897 1248 508 1399 669 1101 320 683 270 1148 1490 120 910 805